I've done some more triple khans drafts, and have continued to find myself steering away from four and five color builds. When I first looked at khans, my expectation was that the vast majority of the time I'd be in a three color clan. As I draft, however, I find that there's more to it than that. Still, sometimes it is good to be in a clan:
This was what I pulled together at my LGS, a white-black build splashing green for some really, really powerful stuff. However, in the draft I was too dismissive of just a straight b/w warrior build, which I could have gone into and possible have been even more powerful. Similarly, I could have used the incremental growth I nabbed in the draft, and gone further into green for more power, but in picking up the powerful cards, I didn't have the picks I needed for getting lands.
In short, this draft gave me the opportunity to go in one direction towards consistency, and in another direction towards power, and I hedged, creating a middle-of-the-road deck. I think that the deck suffered for this, and I went 1-2. I was able to win against another just-alright deck due to some well-timed instants, but I got crushed by two mardu token decks that got out of the gate quickly and I was never able to fully stabilize against.
Well, I stabilized to a certain extent, but trumpet blast has a way of putting the last few damage through. Heck, in round one my opponent played not just one, but two hordeling outbursts plus the ponyback brigade. Even with me killing a couple of tokens on each of his attacks, he had so many to spare that he could just suicide them in to get me dead.
These round 1 and 3 losses to mardu tokens were disappointing, as I felt that with my early drops I should be able to stabilize quickly and take over the game, but my lands didn't cooperate. A couple of scoured barrens or jungle hallows would have helped immeasurably. Lesson learnt, however: I should be taking lands a bit higher, and the tokens deck is real, if it's open and the packs are there.
Going online, I tried as hard as a I could to stay open. After opening a jeskai ascendancy, I decided to see if I could use it effectively in a deck. I took the best blue, red and white spells that were being passed to me, and when the dust settled (and I realized that white just was not open) I ended up with a very sweet-looking u/r build.
In round 1, it did exactly what I meant it to do: it punished my four or five color opponent by establishing an early clock with a bunch of goblin pikers and disrupting blocking plans with my spells. It was close, however, as a couple of the sanctuary lands would negate an entire wetland sambar hit, without costing my opponent much as he didn't have early plays to make anyway. Still, I managed to pull it out.
Round 2 was interesting, as I found myself against another red/blue deck, which surprised me. He must have been at the seat directly across from me, as we both had a lot of solid cards in those colors. These games were all pure tempo, with whoever got on the board first and was able to follow it up with a disruptive spell pulling out the win. In game three, I felt myself in a good position, as I was on the play and started things off well, but proceeded to just draw lands and die. His set adrift was particularly brutal as it not only set my board back but also put me further away from drawing my threats and disruption. One arrow storm or master the way was all I needed to win, but modo was not in a generous mood that night.
The red/blue deck in khans reminds me a lot of izzet in triple return to ravnica. Canyon lurkers in particular fills the role of cobble brute from the set: a big dumb beater than when supported can hit your opponent for unreasonable amounts. Flying crane technique does a similar job to teleportal, and singing bell strike and act of treason, in the proper board state, can also help reach through to just end the game.
But what about five color decks? As a fan of the original ravnica block and the five-color green deck from modern masters, I feel comfortable going deep, and drafting more than my fair share of colors. Have I become too disciplined? Should I just loosen up a little? It's hard to say. I take the tri-lands very highly, as the last two decks show - they have tri-lands but none of the new sanctuaries.
I wonder if making four or five color works depends on drafting in a field of people trying to be disciplined and go two colors, as if most people are trying to draft a clan, they'll pick up those two color lands to support their three-color plan. Even the allied life-lands go sooner than you'd think. Listening to the latest limited resources, I find myself really hankering to go in that route. Is it good enough to force? I have a really hard time forcing myself to force: I've really trained myself to try to be receptive to what colors are flowing. Still, tonight I'm going to keep my eyes open, and try to take lands more highly.
Either that, or I guess I'll just take all the hordeling outbursts.
Friday, October 17, 2014
Saturday, October 4, 2014
Breaking the Format: Boros aggro in triple Khans
I never meant to go boros in my first khans draft. I see these beautiful, beautiful black-green midrange strategies, either in sultai or abzan, and my heart goes all aflutter. I see a one-mana 0/4 with upside and my eyes perk up. So it was with some surprise that I found myself in boros aggro, an archetype that I didn't think was even possible in triple khans, let alone any good.
It all started off with a bit of a dud pack. Abzan falconer was, I believe, the pick. Wanting to try out the falconer, I tried to take as many simple, good white cards that I could. When red seemed to be open, I decided to move in, theorizing that I would leave myself open to splashing either blue or black, depending.
Well, fast forward a couple of packs, and I never saw a card which was good enough to bring me into a third color. Meanwhile, I had been picking up some late trumpet blasts, more out of curiosity than any serious strategic considerations, and I had ended up with the following monster:
Creatures: 12 total
1 Monastery Swiftspear 1 Timely Hordemate
1 Highspire Mantis
2 Seeker of the Way 1 Summit Prowler
1 Ainok Bond-Kin 1 Mardu Warshrieker
1 War-Name Aspirant
2 Abzan Falconer
1 Mardu Hordechief
Spells: 11 total
1 Defiant Strike 2 Bring Low
1 Burn Away
1 Suspension Field 1 Arrow Storm
1 Feat of Resistance
2 Trumpet Blast
1 Act of Treason
1 Dragon Grip
I had one mystic monastery which I had taken early on in the draft, thinking I might want to be jeskai, but that never materialized, so it just served as a humble guildgate. After getting the round one bye, I proceeded to go 2-1 in matches, so clearly the deck had some power behind it. Indeed, my one loss was to a similarly aggressive jeskai deck, in the final round. It was the first round where my low creature count really cost me, as he was playing similarly low cost threats, but he had slightly more interaction in the form of removal and the pure tempo crippling chill. Had I hit some more of my early drops in that game, I might have prevailed, but with a mere five 1-2 drops, my luck ran out.
I don't expect this to be a common strategy. In fact, I'd wager that 95-98% of the time you'll be drafting a wedge, so you might go through this format and never draft a two color strategy. However, I think it pays to be open to the possibility.
That was my first draft of the format, at last weeks FNM. This week, I had what I would consider a more typical khans draft, and in fact almost a polar opposite to the deck I drafted above. Here's the list:
Where last week's deck was designed to be fast, last night's was designed to be slow. Whereas last week's deck had only one mana-land, this week's had five. From red/white to the opposite: BUG, and from seventeen lands to eighteen.
The draft started off with the rattleclaw mystic. I hoped to situate myself in that clan, to make that card as good as possible, but red started to dry up right quick. Meanwhile I got passed the spellsnatcher and the mystic of the hidden way, cards that excited me. With eighteen lands and a rattleclaw, "getting" someone with the spellsnatcher seemed very viable, and with as stally as khans can be sometimes, the unblockable morph has a ton of value. Starting off the first few picks green/blue left myself open to two clans, and when I started to see some really late but decent black cards, including very late kin tree invocations, I decided to go in.
I had noticed that the sultai wedge had a "toughness matters" subtheme, and I decided to explore that. I would've loved to have the sultai flayer, or an extra disowned ancestor, but the deck ran smoothly as it was. Dragon's eye savants was a surprise hit for the deck, hitting for two when I didn't have the invocation, and hitting the board as an 0/5 when I did.
Ultimately the deck performed well, going 3-0 after a first round bye (what are the odds, the second week in a row???) The third round in particular was instructive, as on game three I chose to draw against a similarly midrange temur deck. I was able to establish good blockers, and bide my time with the spellsnatcher. With an archer's parapet and morphed spellsnatcher on board, the pressure was on him to play something swingy to get ahead. The card proved to be temur charm. Unmorphing not only got me the temur charm, but saved me a 4/4 token from getting gobbled up. With the knowledge that his next play would just get mana leaked, he scooped 'em up. In the end, the only thing I could complain about was archer's parapet not having reach. I mean, come on! Look at how tall that tower is!
It all started off with a bit of a dud pack. Abzan falconer was, I believe, the pick. Wanting to try out the falconer, I tried to take as many simple, good white cards that I could. When red seemed to be open, I decided to move in, theorizing that I would leave myself open to splashing either blue or black, depending.
Well, fast forward a couple of packs, and I never saw a card which was good enough to bring me into a third color. Meanwhile, I had been picking up some late trumpet blasts, more out of curiosity than any serious strategic considerations, and I had ended up with the following monster:
Creatures: 12 total
1 Monastery Swiftspear 1 Timely Hordemate
1 Highspire Mantis
2 Seeker of the Way 1 Summit Prowler
1 Ainok Bond-Kin 1 Mardu Warshrieker
1 War-Name Aspirant
2 Abzan Falconer
1 Mardu Hordechief
Spells: 11 total
1 Defiant Strike 2 Bring Low
1 Burn Away
1 Suspension Field 1 Arrow Storm
1 Feat of Resistance
2 Trumpet Blast
1 Act of Treason
1 Dragon Grip
I had one mystic monastery which I had taken early on in the draft, thinking I might want to be jeskai, but that never materialized, so it just served as a humble guildgate. After getting the round one bye, I proceeded to go 2-1 in matches, so clearly the deck had some power behind it. Indeed, my one loss was to a similarly aggressive jeskai deck, in the final round. It was the first round where my low creature count really cost me, as he was playing similarly low cost threats, but he had slightly more interaction in the form of removal and the pure tempo crippling chill. Had I hit some more of my early drops in that game, I might have prevailed, but with a mere five 1-2 drops, my luck ran out.
I don't expect this to be a common strategy. In fact, I'd wager that 95-98% of the time you'll be drafting a wedge, so you might go through this format and never draft a two color strategy. However, I think it pays to be open to the possibility.
That was my first draft of the format, at last weeks FNM. This week, I had what I would consider a more typical khans draft, and in fact almost a polar opposite to the deck I drafted above. Here's the list:
Where last week's deck was designed to be fast, last night's was designed to be slow. Whereas last week's deck had only one mana-land, this week's had five. From red/white to the opposite: BUG, and from seventeen lands to eighteen.
The draft started off with the rattleclaw mystic. I hoped to situate myself in that clan, to make that card as good as possible, but red started to dry up right quick. Meanwhile I got passed the spellsnatcher and the mystic of the hidden way, cards that excited me. With eighteen lands and a rattleclaw, "getting" someone with the spellsnatcher seemed very viable, and with as stally as khans can be sometimes, the unblockable morph has a ton of value. Starting off the first few picks green/blue left myself open to two clans, and when I started to see some really late but decent black cards, including very late kin tree invocations, I decided to go in.
I had noticed that the sultai wedge had a "toughness matters" subtheme, and I decided to explore that. I would've loved to have the sultai flayer, or an extra disowned ancestor, but the deck ran smoothly as it was. Dragon's eye savants was a surprise hit for the deck, hitting for two when I didn't have the invocation, and hitting the board as an 0/5 when I did.
Ultimately the deck performed well, going 3-0 after a first round bye (what are the odds, the second week in a row???) The third round in particular was instructive, as on game three I chose to draw against a similarly midrange temur deck. I was able to establish good blockers, and bide my time with the spellsnatcher. With an archer's parapet and morphed spellsnatcher on board, the pressure was on him to play something swingy to get ahead. The card proved to be temur charm. Unmorphing not only got me the temur charm, but saved me a 4/4 token from getting gobbled up. With the knowledge that his next play would just get mana leaked, he scooped 'em up. In the end, the only thing I could complain about was archer's parapet not having reach. I mean, come on! Look at how tall that tower is!
Sunday, September 28, 2014
The Limited Resources Cube: A Draft Report
So what was I to do? Well, I've been known to cube with people in real life, so what if that experience could be taken online, without the whole nasty money factor that you get with modo? Of course, I had been looking to try out the Limited Resources cube for a long time. As a long time LR fan, I had heard mention of it, and it had always been at the back of my mind, something I wanted to give a try but I never got around to.
Sometimes, what it takes is a good walloping to get your ass into gear, and after being thoroughly destroyed in a few modo cube drafts, I signed up for this past thursday's LR cube draft. And not only would it be free, but the list of cards would be different, giving me a chance to try something new! Win/win.
Before hand, I had given the cube a quick spin on cubetutor, seeing what archetypes were available, and trying to get a feel for each of the colors. I quickly noticed that there was a very distinctive g/b graveyard theme in the mix, possibly incorporating blue if you got the spider spawning. And if you got spider spawning, you could pretty much count on getting its best buddy, gnaw to the bone!
With that in mind, I took a bone shredder out of a fairly weak pack for my first pick. Not only would this go well in a spider spawning deck, if that was open, but it would leave me open to other black options. In more powerful cubes, black often gets left behind, as it only has one powerful planeswalker, and its powerful removal spells are often less good against decks full of creatures with comes-into-play effects. However, a powered-down cube like this one doesn't have planeswalkers and some other bomby effects that black lacks, and the inherent power of black can shine just a little bit more.
Well, green wasn't open, ultimately. While I kept picking up decent black cards, solidifying that as my main color, I struggled early in the draft to find a second color. While I got great blue cards, I was getting some sweet white cards as well. Esper control?
In the end, I ultimately couldn't justify including white in my pool, despite having a day of judgement and a little bit of white fixing. I would have really loved to play day of judgement, because wrath effects are far rarer and thus harder to play around in the LR cube, but I opted for some more consistency. I made a mental note to potentially side in plains for that, and the mortify and disenchant if I saw good targets, but it never came up.
The deck fell solidly into a blue/black control archetype. I just couldn't stop myself from picking creatures that killed other creatures, with duplicant (one of my favorite all-time cards) topping the curve at that effect. I was really happy with this, as the deck gave me both some early defenses and ways to grind card advantage. Having five six drops was concerning, but I hoped that playing a high land count plus the signet would help me get there. For additional synergy, I had THREE merfolk looters to help loot away any extra lands, further justifying the eighteen lands.
Round one I played against B0neReaver, and my hoped-for turn-around failed to materialize as his deck presented threats that were either well-positioned against me, or I simply played against badly. I completely forgot that bone splitter doesn't target artifacts, which meant that it only killed an irrelevant master splicer than the crucial golem token. I managed to land a volition reins on the behemoth sledge, hoping to use it to life-gain me back into the game, but skeletal vampire would have ultimate been the better target as it was just more important to develop my board in terms of creatures.
Round two started, and I played against DogPuppy, wielding a three color deck. With a grisly salvage in his deck, I suspected he had been going for a graveyard/spider spawning strategy, but it hadn't been there for him. He wasn't able to present an early threat, allowing me to build up enough mana for my swingy effects. I decided to steal the lightning greaves, to ensure that all of my ETB creatures would be able to have their effects.
As the game wore on, I continued to grind, grind grind, with the added benefit of being able to equip the greaves onto a looter for an ultra-speedy loot!
In the next game, I was once again able to have time to build up my defenses so as to create a superior board. Lightning greaves protected his yeva, yes, but it can only protect one creature at a time, which allowed me to enslave or otherwise deal with his other threats while continuing to build up my own board. At last, victory! And it only took a six-mana mind control to do it!
Game three was against my third green opponent. I guess I was right to hope out of green! Well, I never really hopped in, but I had been actively looking for a reason to go green: a reason which never came. Unlike my previous multicolor opponents, emerald was playing a more conservative straight green-blue build. I knew I was in trouble when he landed a card which I just have an incredible amount of trouble defeating: juggernaut.
Yes, on the board my murderous redcap deals nicely with it, but none of my in hand cards would, and I knew that he would have some way to protect it. A briarhorn later, and I was in trouble. I was able to build up my board with a domestication and a talrands invocation, but ultimately it wasn't enough and I succumbed to his threats.
Games 2 and three were more in my favor though. Being on the play game 2 helped take some of the early pressure as I was allowed to reach turn three unscathed:
With three lands in hand, my plan was to essentially allow my opponent to play into a crushing life's finale, and follow it up with either mulldrifter or duplicant. Although I decided to play the mulldrifter at five, to buy me a little more time to get more life's finale value, this was ultimately not a losing plan.
Game three was similarly "according to plan" as I was able to barter in blood for full value, following it up with any one of my sweet sweet creatures.
At long last, a 2-1 draft! It had been a while, and it felt good to win again. The power level of this deck was, I felt, incredibly high, so I couldn't take too much solace in the victory; how would I have done with a worse deck, after all? Still, I felt like I was shaking off a slump. I really enjoyed playing this style of blue-black control. I didn't have card draw spells, and my sweepers were bad by traditional cube standards, but the inherent card advantage of my creatures was able to make up for those potential problems.
Looking back, I noticed that three of my opponents were green. As was Asturiel, the draft coordinator! with four players in green, I was happy I stayed out. He had drafted the much-desired spider-spawning deck. I wonder how high he took it?
Sunday, September 14, 2014
Conspiracy Drafts: Powering through
I love high-powered draft formats. Cube, of course, is the highest-power of all draft formats and it's hard for me to get enough of cube. All too often, in more powered-down draft formats it feels as though one is just skimming through pack after pack where the decision making process is too easy, as there are only a few cards which stand out and the only decision, really, is which colors to go into. When you get to pick 5, however, and there are multiple cards in each color that you're in, the decision of what to take becomes more interesting.
Does the power-level of a format make a significant difference in terms of how skill-testing it may be? I'm not so sure. If every card to choose from is powerful, it is certainly easier for a less-skilled drafter to assemble a deck capable of powerful things. To create a poor deck there is an exercise in self-defeat: inattention to mana curve, playing too many colors for too little benefit, things of that sort. I suspect that good drafters and good players are about as advantaged in a high-level format as they are in a less-powered one.
So not too long ago I wanted to take a break from conventional local game store drafting and get an in-person fix of something a little bit more high-powered. When I heard the call ring out for a local Conspiracy draft, I was in, and in big. One of the hallmarks of a powerful draft environment is the ability to bend and break magic in an advantageous way, and I knew that conspiracy would offer that. After all, how often do we get draft environments with sweet commons like these?
Does the power-level of a format make a significant difference in terms of how skill-testing it may be? I'm not so sure. If every card to choose from is powerful, it is certainly easier for a less-skilled drafter to assemble a deck capable of powerful things. To create a poor deck there is an exercise in self-defeat: inattention to mana curve, playing too many colors for too little benefit, things of that sort. I suspect that good drafters and good players are about as advantaged in a high-level format as they are in a less-powered one.
So not too long ago I wanted to take a break from conventional local game store drafting and get an in-person fix of something a little bit more high-powered. When I heard the call ring out for a local Conspiracy draft, I was in, and in big. One of the hallmarks of a powerful draft environment is the ability to bend and break magic in an advantageous way, and I knew that conspiracy would offer that. After all, how often do we get draft environments with sweet commons like these?
Alright, alright. If you're familiar with bad cards from the past, you'll know that I've tweaked these cards a little. The first two have gained the birds of paradise ability; the third has gained additional power and toughness. All of this is made possible with conspiracies, a mechanic in the set which affects the draft itself as much as it affects the gameplay. At my most recent conspiracy draft, conspiracies went much later than I would hope. Certainly, I was very judicious in passing my own conspiracies, letting only a couple by.
Fundamentally, conspiracies reward drafting multiple cards of the same name. The birds of paradise conspiracy is not great if you only have one target for it, but if there are junky one and two drops that nobody wants, you can get birds of paradise as much as you like. Conspiracies are an investment; if you don't see any early on in the draft, drafting creatures with the same name is an investment for any potential conspiracies you might open or get passed later on. I had gotten an early muzzio's preparation in this draft, and had been focusing hard on trying to get it to work, with two shoreline rangers and three zombie goliaths, so when I got a second one late in the draft, it became easily the most powerful card in the pack. Ultimately, living the 6/5 for five mana dream was not for me, though. Black was cut pretty hard, and in the game that followed the ability for shoreline ranger to block in the air became key.
Enter the Dack...
For most of pack one, I was blue black, with such control powerhouses as reckless spite and fact or fiction. However, I noticed some oddly late red picks at the tail end, and made a mental note. When I was lucky enough to open Dack Fayden in pack two, I made the decision to go all-in into blue red, possibly splashing black if the mana worked out. Brimstone volley is less good, far less good, in a four-player (or more) game, but it's still useful, and the inclusion of a singleton reito lantern proved key in allowing me to not only deck myself with Dack, but to draw infinite brimstone volleys in the end game. In my second conspiracy draft, I emerged victorious!
Certainly, my play was tight, and the weird diplomacy of a multiplayer game helped, but I'll remember this draft most of all for demonstrating the power of switching colors. I could have obstinately stuck to blue-black, splashing red for Just Dack, but my deck would have emerged far less powerful. Oddly powerful last picks sometimes may be more than just an abberation: sometimes, they can provide clues to help us navigate the draft more skillfully.
Tuesday, July 29, 2014
M15: Where to Gain the Edge?
This week, M15 has hit magic on-line in full force, and eager to try out the new format more than I have already at my local game store, I decided to head on-line to do battle. This timing was fortuitous, as the modo people, in their wisdom, decided to bribe people to play on the new client with free phantom points.
It's always difficult to write about limited. When you create an article, or a journal entry, the goal is to create something new, to explore some facet of the experience which has not been explored. Ideas that can improve one's play in terms of general strategy are already out there, in articles, podcasts, and conversations among players. I assume that you don't need me to instruct you in card advantage, reading signals, and other such elementary facets of limited. Because I like to assume that my viewer is generally with it on such fundamentals, I try to approach the aspect of limited which is constantly shifting: how the introduction of a new set affects the limited meta-game. If we assume that everyone understands the fundamentals, then the way to get ahead is to understand the new format, hopefully earlier and with greater depth than our opponents (and hey, hope to get a good draw while we're at it).
Core sets can prove challenging in this regard, as their power is driven by relatively straight-forward bombs, and often the best route to success relies on the fundamentals, rather than oddball archetypes. But it wouldn't be very exciting if all I left you with for advice on drafting M15 was "stay open, read signals, play good cards, and pay attention to your mana curve" would it? So, despite my sense that M15 is not a terribly synergistic set, I shall attempt to look into this format hoping to discover small edges that we as competitors can seize, and if I must discuss aspects of limited that you already understand, hopefully you can get some value as I discuss these topics in a new context.
First, we should talk a little bit about M15 sealed. While my sealed decks are not entirely indicative of the format in general because of the inclusion of promo cards, I still learned some important lessons from these decks and rounds.
In my first, real-life, pool, I chose red as my color. With lightning strike as a common, this color seemed well positioned against the many black decks I would be facing, as I would (theoretically) have access to a kill spell which for a mere two mana would take care of the black promo. Fortunately, I did have the two lightning strikes, and was fortunate to open up a Chandra as well. Combined with a bounty of black removal spells, I was able to construct a powerful red/black control deck which would allow me to play defense until such a time as I would land my siege dragon.
I went 4-0, including one memorable game against a red deck where I thought I was just dead to my opponents turn 2 borderland marauder. I fell down to just a few points of life, when removal spells and a timely rotfeaster maggot were able to stabilize the situation. While wall of fire (as seen above, in its more beautiful incarnation) is never a high pick in draft, in a sealed red/black control deck it proved incredibly important as its high toughness and threat of activation proved a potent deterrent to ground-pounders.
In my second pool, I had a larger challenge, as my pool could have gone in two different directions. Black was an obvious choice, but whether to pair it with green or blue was an unsettled question. Here's the deck I registered:
This deck contained a lot of raw power: card draw, removal, bombs. However, what it lacked was a strong early game. Simply having two strong one-drops was not enough, and against more aggressive pools, which I saw more often than I expected to, I found myself sideboarding into a speedier b/g strategy:
Featuring more creatures, and the ability to gain tempo advantage with elvish mystics (wizards, bring back our llanowar elves, please! with the freaky headgear, preferably), this deck was better able to impact the board. Elvish mystics are worse top-decks than the blue draw spells the previous build had, but the cost of potentially drawing them late was well worth their inclusion. Somewhat durdly two drops also added to the cohesion of this strategy by contributing to the convoke spells. Satyr wayfinder, in particular, seems an especially juicy creature in a convoke-heavy deck, with it's ability to tap to reduce cost and find a land to play those pricey spells. Yes, accidentally milling my garruk sucked, but you have to fight through things like that. Additionally, the incidental lifegain present in the deck proved useful time and again as I found myself racing: four points of life from covenant combined with another 3-5 from rotfeaster maggot adds up real quick.
Despite this very strong pool, I went 2-2. Of course, I like to console myself with the fact that my deck went 2-0 against draws which didn't contain soul of shandalar, but that's not much comfort. Flesh to dust, garruk, and encrust were my best answers to that powerful card that my deck contained, but I just couldn't find them in time in either of the two rounds where I lost. The soul of innistrad round, by comparison, felt like a breeze.
Going forward we won't have access to such weighted pools, and general sealed advice will be more useful. The best sealed pools will have sufficient two and three drops as a hedge against aggro decks, while containing powerful game-swinging spells. With six planeswalkers in the mythic slots along with the five powerful souls, you'd better either build a deck with the ability to end games before those powerful cards can unleash their full potential or be playing them yourself.
While black and red seemed very strong in sealed, I determined not to force these colors as the drafts I joined fired. The buzz in the community is that red is one of the stronger draft colors, and given that each color has some powerful cards to recommend it, I made a point to only go red if I were receiving pronounced signals that it was open. Spoiler alert: it never was, and the only good red cards I'd end up taking were late, third-pack hate drafts.
I was eager to explore the power of white in particular, and see if triplicate spirits could measure up to the long tradition of evasive white token makers. Battle screech, lingering souls, spectral procession: all powerful white spells that can cause your opponent nightmares. Even timely reinforcements was a high-pick in its day. When my first draft presented me with a pack 1 pick 1 spirit bonds, I decided to see if I could go into a token-heavy "wide" theme. This was the result:
With seventeen creatures (not including triplicate spirits) this deck supported spirit bonds very well. The nice things is, spirit bonds rewards you for something you want to be doing anyway: drafting creatures. With removal spells being in short supply, this deck made winning with creatures alone its goal. Pump spells and favorable trading allowed it to move past the first two rounds of red decks before splitting in the finals. The one round where I did draw spirit bonds in my opening hand, it helped me handily crush an aggro deck as it allowed me to trade more effectively.
This was a premiere, 64-person draft where a first-pick raise the alarm out of a fairly disappointing pack led to a very interesting, quite aggressive build. This deck supported sanctified charge even better than the previous deck did. While it easily crushed the red deck I played in the first round, I lost a real close one in round 2 where the red deck I played against managed to whittle me down with island-walking squid tokens. Had I had one more creature on board, I would've been able to use the sanctified charge in hand to demolish my opponent from a seemingly healthy life-total.
After that disappointing 1-1 finish, I immediately dove into another 8-4. Pack 1 offered up a green paragon, and curious to see if I could build around it by grabbing a bunch of solid green dudes to make even better, I kind of wound up forcing green. Honestly, I got very lucky in this draft by being passed all those juggernauts, and to open that twingrove, as I came very close to having a very bad deck. As it was, I was able to split the finals with this deck, grinding my way through the competition.
Although individually most of my creatures were just alright, the small synergies added up. Even invasive species was able to help out, by unsummoning a rotfeaster maggot that had a stab wounds on it. It is possible that unmake the graves should have been in the maindeck, considering the satyr wayfinders enabled it's strategy, but all of my opponents made strong early-game plays were it was far better to spend my mana developing my board rather than accruing card advantage.
Red is one of my favorite colors in magic. When I first started playing the game, my best deck was an earth elemental control deck, using lightning bolt, earthbind, and fireball to try to secure victory. Sadly, it is rare that I find myself in red in limited these days. Even in draft formats where it is not particularly strong, it can be a very popular draft choice, as people have dreams of blasting their opponent's face, and when it is incredibly strong it almost never seems open. Red in m15 seems to have this reputation, and for good reason: it has more than one premium common, giving it a depth it sometimes lacks. However, for as deep as it seems, if it continues to attract multiple drafters at each table, that theoretical depth will remain just a theory. The most powerful red deck I drafted in m14 was a red/black sacrifice deck, and in that draft I was getting last-pick act of treasons; the deck was so open that I would have been a fool to ignore it.
My advice for m15 is to respect the power of red: draft it if you open the red soul, or chandra, but be prepare to move out or have a different color as your main, as all those lightning strikes, borderland marauders, and nightfire giants floating around will very likely create drafters who want to fight you for picks. Further, ensure that your deck has resilience to the red deck. Packing a high number of creatures can help you against borderland marauder + lightning strike, a start which shouldn't surprise anyone given that they're both commons.
Monday, June 16, 2014
How to 2-1 a VMA 8-4 with U/R control
Vintage masters is a very exciting format. It has stirred the drafting juices like nothing I can think of since modern masters. I think the largest reason is the sheer depth of the format. For whatever reason, wotc seems to think that saddling expert and core set releases with unplayable garbage is a good thing for it is "skill testing." Balderdash. While I understand that "these cards are not for me" (I'm looking at you, ephara's radiance!) the number of unplayables that each color gets in these more common sets is very dispiriting. When you get the pack you cracked back and your faced with a complete sea of garbage, that feels bad, but for some reason WotC seems to care less about that feel bad moment than they do the feel bad amount of having your land destroyed, your creature killed, or your spell countered.
Tangent aside, I've been doing fairly well with vintage masters: certainly better than I have with traditional expansions. I really relish the chance to play with powerful spells, and bringing decks with a few decent creatures and many very effective spells has been proving effective. Presenting: u/r control:
Powerful removal spells, a busted card advantage engine, and a few powerful finishers: everything I want in a control deck. I find myself taking the cycling lands higher and higher as the depth of the format allows me to more reasonably wheel playable cards. Certainly the velocity afforded by the cycle lands helped me consistently draw into the action of my deck - a very low-cost flood insurance policy indeed.
Round 1 I played against a mono-black aggro deck, a challenge indeed. A choking sands slowed me down sufficiently in round 1 that I just lost. In game 2, I stabilized at 1 life, just barely. At 1 life, he attacked me with a death's-head buzzard and putrid imp. In response, I cast starstorm with x=1. I thought I had made a terrible mistake as he proceeded to discard two or three cards to make putrid imp a 2/2. However, I was saved as his death's head buzzard proceeded to finish the 2/2 off with it's death trigger! I never expected that my own "misplay" would prompt my opponent to misplay so badly, but with this sudden turn of events I was able to turn the game around. While at 1 life, I was able to play a thread and hold up counterspell in the event that he would draw a burn spell off the top, and removal in case he played anything else.
Round 2 I played against white weenie, and the true power of my deck emerged. In the screenshot below I was able to get so much value off of starfall and rescind that I felt truly dirty. Starfall managed to nab 4 creatures, spark spray nabbed a fifth, and then rescind bounced a mistmoon griffin that he had loaded up with first empyrial armor, then a brilliant halo.
No way! Timely instant removal blunted the impact of skullclamp in the very early turns, leaving him with just a benalish trapper: a poor skullclamp target indeed. Seeing that his one creature was defensive, I decided to turn the screws to him by becoming the beatdown. Prophetic bolt turned the race in my favor in a very card-friendly way, and once I had him on the defensive a simple counterspell was all I needed to ensure victory. The might FTK helped too, certainly.
Sadly, my opponent in round 3 declined the split, and I found myself getting out card-advantaged by a blue-green goodstuff deck. While future sight is a powerful draw engine, it got countersinked while his own fact or fiction resolved while I hadn't yet drawn into my counterspells. I perhaps made a too-clever play by using aftershock to remove what appeared to be his own red source, but it would have been better served smiting his 8/8 realm seekers that he laid down the following turn. An 8/8 was simply too large to handle and I found myself chump-blocking to death.
Still, I was happy with the strategy, my only regret not playing 18 lands in the main. With 3 actual counterspells, I wanted more blue mana in every game 1. Adding an island after sideboarding while taking out something mediocre definitely helped my consistency while the lonely sandbars served to help with flood issues. Another surprise hit was spark spray. There are a surprisingly large number of x-1s in the format, and if you come up against a deck where it has no targets, you're not down all that much because it can help you find your actual answer cards.
Good luck to you in your own drafts, and let me know if you have had similar success with control in this format. Aggro is currently the most popular strategy, it seems to me, and I'll be curious to see if the meta evolves such that it becomes less popular.
Tangent aside, I've been doing fairly well with vintage masters: certainly better than I have with traditional expansions. I really relish the chance to play with powerful spells, and bringing decks with a few decent creatures and many very effective spells has been proving effective. Presenting: u/r control:
Powerful removal spells, a busted card advantage engine, and a few powerful finishers: everything I want in a control deck. I find myself taking the cycling lands higher and higher as the depth of the format allows me to more reasonably wheel playable cards. Certainly the velocity afforded by the cycle lands helped me consistently draw into the action of my deck - a very low-cost flood insurance policy indeed.
Round 1 I played against a mono-black aggro deck, a challenge indeed. A choking sands slowed me down sufficiently in round 1 that I just lost. In game 2, I stabilized at 1 life, just barely. At 1 life, he attacked me with a death's-head buzzard and putrid imp. In response, I cast starstorm with x=1. I thought I had made a terrible mistake as he proceeded to discard two or three cards to make putrid imp a 2/2. However, I was saved as his death's head buzzard proceeded to finish the 2/2 off with it's death trigger! I never expected that my own "misplay" would prompt my opponent to misplay so badly, but with this sudden turn of events I was able to turn the game around. While at 1 life, I was able to play a thread and hold up counterspell in the event that he would draw a burn spell off the top, and removal in case he played anything else.
Round 2 I played against white weenie, and the true power of my deck emerged. In the screenshot below I was able to get so much value off of starfall and rescind that I felt truly dirty. Starfall managed to nab 4 creatures, spark spray nabbed a fifth, and then rescind bounced a mistmoon griffin that he had loaded up with first empyrial armor, then a brilliant halo.
In the next game he led off with skullclamp, a very scary card indeed. I felt a pit in my stomach as I was certain it was the very skullclamp I had passed for a kindle. Would I be finished off by my failure to hatedraft?
Sadly, my opponent in round 3 declined the split, and I found myself getting out card-advantaged by a blue-green goodstuff deck. While future sight is a powerful draw engine, it got countersinked while his own fact or fiction resolved while I hadn't yet drawn into my counterspells. I perhaps made a too-clever play by using aftershock to remove what appeared to be his own red source, but it would have been better served smiting his 8/8 realm seekers that he laid down the following turn. An 8/8 was simply too large to handle and I found myself chump-blocking to death.
Still, I was happy with the strategy, my only regret not playing 18 lands in the main. With 3 actual counterspells, I wanted more blue mana in every game 1. Adding an island after sideboarding while taking out something mediocre definitely helped my consistency while the lonely sandbars served to help with flood issues. Another surprise hit was spark spray. There are a surprisingly large number of x-1s in the format, and if you come up against a deck where it has no targets, you're not down all that much because it can help you find your actual answer cards.
Good luck to you in your own drafts, and let me know if you have had similar success with control in this format. Aggro is currently the most popular strategy, it seems to me, and I'll be curious to see if the meta evolves such that it becomes less popular.
Sunday, June 15, 2014
A vintage excursion
As I write, draft queues for vintage masters are firing at quite the rate, injecting power nine into the magic online economy, and cratering the price of force of will. I can't say I'm too unhappy with the massive smash in prices that this set has brought, despite that diminishing the EV of vintage masters itself. What I am happy about, however, is the chance to draft with fact or fiction as an uncommon. Uncommon! I've gotten a few drafts under my belt, and I have some first impressions of the format as a whole. I'm not an amazing drafter; I'm no Ben Stark mastermind. However, I try my best and I can definitely hold my own.
In my first draft, after cracking a mox emerald pack 1 pick 1, I decided to try and go green to take advantage of the sparkly piece of power. While forcing green, I kept my eyes open for an auxiliary color, settling on blue when late men of war started floating my way.
I was quite happy to field this deck, as the combination of ramp, fatties, card draw and interaction seemed to be just the sort of midrange deck that would have play against a wide variety of decks. In the swiss queue, I first faced an incredibly aggressive red black deck which demolished me in short order. The madness value that I hoped to gain was too "cute" to weather the aggro storm I faced, by far. Against red aggressive decks, cards like krosan tusker and ophidian seem like a sad joke.
I followed this up with an underwhelming performance against b/w value/grind. With having mulligan issues, I was never able to gain traction against his plentiful removal spells, and creatures which entered the battlefield with strong effects. By removing my key creatures, he was able to blank my less important ones. Fyndhorn elves, while often strong against sacrifice effects, is less strong when you've mulliganed and need every ounce of mana you can get. Third up in the swiss was a similar w/b control deck, splashing red for more removal. This color combination seemed a bit awkward, and I was able to take the match down by getting my ophidian engine online. It should come as no surprise that ophidian into man of war is a strong combination, and as my board built up steadily, simple one for one removal spells proved ineffective.
Next up was a sweet, sweet control list, featuring a grand total of 7 creatures, with a grand total of fourteen power. And two of those wanted to be cycled for lightning rift shenanigans! Where the r/w/b control deck I faced in the finals failed, this succeeded. I attribute this to the two engines the deck contained of library of alexandria and lightning rift. With a full eight ways to cycle, I found myself pinging the small threats and exiling the large ones. White was cut off in pack 1, and I wasn't exactly sure where I was at, color wise, going into pack 2. Pack 2 provided so much incredible white, however, that it was worth it do dive into it for a splash. Indeed, taking as many white cards as I did proved invaluable in the draft, as I was able to win a match by siding into R/W splashing blue against fatty green monsters where the benalish trappers would shine. One memorable game involved casting dack's duplicate on a symbiotic worm, and the swords to plowsharing the opponents worm. This line did not lose.
I faced decks of varying aggression during each of the three rounds, and often I had my back up against the wall. Sideboarding proved critical as memory jar would be replaced by something more relevant. I knew that this draft hold a special place in my heart when pack 1 provided me not only with the library, but also memory jar and mind's desire. Control in this environment is challenging, but with so many people deciding to hop on the red bandwagon, if you can preserve your life total and spend your removal spells wisely, it is possible to play the card advantage game to positive results.
After that, I felt confident enough to enter an 8-4. I enjoy playing control; it is where my greatest strengths as a magic player lie. With that in mind, I went in ready to play w/u control, as that seems the most effective control color combination. At random times, I picked up very late salt flats, which meant that when a late magister of worth came along in pack three, I was able to snatch it up. Again, I faced aggressive decks, although if anything these aggressive decks felt less powerful than those I had faced in the swiss queues! Perhaps the growing popularity of aggro has made the card pool weaker. In round one, I utterly crushed a red/green aggro deck with fatties. To put it mildly, pillaging horde is not a good answer to control. I was able to at first repel it, and then the turn after simply exile it, for a net of 2 for 5 card advantage, plus the lifegain from exile. He stole one game by killing almost my entire board with the card which deals three damage to all fliers and hitting me for exact lethal, and I sided out my fliers (magister excepted).
The next deck I saw was very interesting, a u/b build which utilized multiple clouds of faeries, thalakos drifters, and other evasive threats. After I won game one, I found myself on the ropes in game 2, stabilizing at 1 life. A timely swords to plowshares removed his thalakos drifters, and my thopter squadrons held off his pesky faeries. While earlier he had used paralyze on on of my thopters, now I was able to simply let it erode away into 1/1 fliers, making his paralyze essentially a burn spell with no other value. I decided to split in the finals, as hey, it's fathers day, and I'm going to go for a bike ride with my dad, and I wanted to get ready for that.
Vintage masters seems like quite a fun format, especially if you enjoy killing creatures. That said, it is important to read signals and get a feel for the metagame. Currently, aggro is enjoying a wave of popularity, but as people get a sense for how to beat them, this could change and the ability to create a killer control deck could dry up. Staying in one color as long as possible, to both cut it off for pack 2, and to see what color is really open from the right, seems especially important. Good luck all, and may you open a foil black lotus!
In my first draft, after cracking a mox emerald pack 1 pick 1, I decided to try and go green to take advantage of the sparkly piece of power. While forcing green, I kept my eyes open for an auxiliary color, settling on blue when late men of war started floating my way.
I was quite happy to field this deck, as the combination of ramp, fatties, card draw and interaction seemed to be just the sort of midrange deck that would have play against a wide variety of decks. In the swiss queue, I first faced an incredibly aggressive red black deck which demolished me in short order. The madness value that I hoped to gain was too "cute" to weather the aggro storm I faced, by far. Against red aggressive decks, cards like krosan tusker and ophidian seem like a sad joke.
I followed this up with an underwhelming performance against b/w value/grind. With having mulligan issues, I was never able to gain traction against his plentiful removal spells, and creatures which entered the battlefield with strong effects. By removing my key creatures, he was able to blank my less important ones. Fyndhorn elves, while often strong against sacrifice effects, is less strong when you've mulliganed and need every ounce of mana you can get. Third up in the swiss was a similar w/b control deck, splashing red for more removal. This color combination seemed a bit awkward, and I was able to take the match down by getting my ophidian engine online. It should come as no surprise that ophidian into man of war is a strong combination, and as my board built up steadily, simple one for one removal spells proved ineffective.
Next up was a sweet, sweet control list, featuring a grand total of 7 creatures, with a grand total of fourteen power. And two of those wanted to be cycled for lightning rift shenanigans! Where the r/w/b control deck I faced in the finals failed, this succeeded. I attribute this to the two engines the deck contained of library of alexandria and lightning rift. With a full eight ways to cycle, I found myself pinging the small threats and exiling the large ones. White was cut off in pack 1, and I wasn't exactly sure where I was at, color wise, going into pack 2. Pack 2 provided so much incredible white, however, that it was worth it do dive into it for a splash. Indeed, taking as many white cards as I did proved invaluable in the draft, as I was able to win a match by siding into R/W splashing blue against fatty green monsters where the benalish trappers would shine. One memorable game involved casting dack's duplicate on a symbiotic worm, and the swords to plowsharing the opponents worm. This line did not lose.
I faced decks of varying aggression during each of the three rounds, and often I had my back up against the wall. Sideboarding proved critical as memory jar would be replaced by something more relevant. I knew that this draft hold a special place in my heart when pack 1 provided me not only with the library, but also memory jar and mind's desire. Control in this environment is challenging, but with so many people deciding to hop on the red bandwagon, if you can preserve your life total and spend your removal spells wisely, it is possible to play the card advantage game to positive results.
After that, I felt confident enough to enter an 8-4. I enjoy playing control; it is where my greatest strengths as a magic player lie. With that in mind, I went in ready to play w/u control, as that seems the most effective control color combination. At random times, I picked up very late salt flats, which meant that when a late magister of worth came along in pack three, I was able to snatch it up. Again, I faced aggressive decks, although if anything these aggressive decks felt less powerful than those I had faced in the swiss queues! Perhaps the growing popularity of aggro has made the card pool weaker. In round one, I utterly crushed a red/green aggro deck with fatties. To put it mildly, pillaging horde is not a good answer to control. I was able to at first repel it, and then the turn after simply exile it, for a net of 2 for 5 card advantage, plus the lifegain from exile. He stole one game by killing almost my entire board with the card which deals three damage to all fliers and hitting me for exact lethal, and I sided out my fliers (magister excepted).
The next deck I saw was very interesting, a u/b build which utilized multiple clouds of faeries, thalakos drifters, and other evasive threats. After I won game one, I found myself on the ropes in game 2, stabilizing at 1 life. A timely swords to plowshares removed his thalakos drifters, and my thopter squadrons held off his pesky faeries. While earlier he had used paralyze on on of my thopters, now I was able to simply let it erode away into 1/1 fliers, making his paralyze essentially a burn spell with no other value. I decided to split in the finals, as hey, it's fathers day, and I'm going to go for a bike ride with my dad, and I wanted to get ready for that.
Vintage masters seems like quite a fun format, especially if you enjoy killing creatures. That said, it is important to read signals and get a feel for the metagame. Currently, aggro is enjoying a wave of popularity, but as people get a sense for how to beat them, this could change and the ability to create a killer control deck could dry up. Staying in one color as long as possible, to both cut it off for pack 2, and to see what color is really open from the right, seems especially important. Good luck all, and may you open a foil black lotus!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)